[libre-riscv-dev] daily kan-ban update 26jun2020

Michael Nolan mtnolan2640 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 20:01:35 BST 2020

On 6/26/20 2:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Friday, June 26, 2020, Michael Nolan <mtnolan2640 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I notice you've already got pi2lsi written,
> the basics of it, yes.  i don't know yet if it will need a FSM or not (like
> in pimem.py).  we'll find out pretty quickly.
>> does it still need to be tested?
> yes, using the unit test code in pimem.py because it is exactly the same
> interface, and all "things" compliant with PortInterface should respond the
> same
> i was thinking of doing the same trick as the (new)
> soc/config/test_loadstore.py where i moved the lsmem.py unit test you
> wrote, to there, then instantiated the thing to be tested via a "chooser"
> class.
> except in this case moving the pimem.py unit test into a similar config
> class tester.
I moved the tests from pimem.py into a new file and made it so the tests 
could be run against either pimem or pi2ls. However, it appears we may 
need to add a state machine or something, because pi2ls isn't asserting 


More information about the libre-riscv-dev mailing list