[libre-riscv-dev] [isa-dev] 3D Open Graphics Alliance

lkcl luke.leighton at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 10:30:30 BST 2019



On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:46:22 AM UTC+1, lkcl wrote:
 

> the only thing is, fitting a third context (beyond the vector table format 
> and the predicate table format) will need a redesign, or to go into the 
> 192+ bit RV opcode format.
>

https://libre-riscv.org/simple_v_extension/vblock_format/#swizzle_format

extended the VBLOCK format (to VBLOCK2).  it's the 192+ bit RISC-V ISA 
format.

(for people not familiar with the VBLOCK format) note that it is *not* 
necessary to load the entire block format into internal instruction 
buffers: the PCVBLK CSR is designed to allow "restarting", following a 
context-switch, so that a (minimal) implementation may go back and re-read 
the VBLOCK context and then "restart" instructions in the middle of a block.

this type of scheme was, interestingly, discussed a couple of months back, 
on isa-dev, independently.

the new VBLOCK2 extended format allows for specifying up to 8 registers to 
be "swizzled", and also extends the number of Register and Predication 
blocks that may be added as context, as well.

i think this should be *in addition* to having an *actual* MV.swizzle 
instruction, because there will be circumstances where the overhead of a 
VBLOCK context is greater than that of a single OP32.

note that due to the way that SV works, many-to-one "retargetting" is 
permitted.  i.e. any given register number in rs1 or rs2 or rd may be 
requested to "redirect" to the EXACT SAME REGISTER, just with different 
"context", such as element width, predicate or not-predicate, 
predicate-with-zeroing, predicate-without-zeroing, and now "swizzle".

it's both powerful and confusing at the same time.

l.



More information about the libre-riscv-dev mailing list