[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 539] New: After tapeout, continue discussion of budget for staf to port PDKMaster + FlexLib + FlexMem to Sky130

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539

            Bug ID: 539
           Summary: After tapeout, continue discussion of budget for staf
                    to port PDKMaster + FlexLib + FlexMem to Sky130
           Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: DEFERRED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: Lowest
         Component: Hardware Layout
          Assignee: staf at fibraservi.eu
          Reporter: colepoirier at gmail.com
                CC: libre-soc-bugs at lists.libre-soc.org, lkcl at lkcl.net
   NLnet milestone: ---

http://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2020-December/001443.html

```
Staf Verhaegen schreef op za Sat Dec 5 10:14:47 GMT 2020:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op za 05-12-2020 om 06:11 [+0000]:
> > On 12/5/20, Cole Poirier <colepoirier at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I’d like to attempt to port Staf’s flexlib to the Skywater pdk
> > 130nm gdsdesign rules. Is this eligible for funding from nlnet?
> 
> if it is limited in scope to a maximum of 1 week, and around EUR
> 500,and, critically, you in no way ask questions that you expect
> eitherStaf or JP to answer (because they absolutely cannot), nor post
> themwhere they could be distracted, *and* you also do not distract me
> fromhelping them to do the core for the 180nm ASIC, then go for it.

One of the reasons why I did not publicize too much about my flexlib
repo is that I consider the code now pre-alpha. This means that I still
plan to totally rework the API meaning lot's of frustration with people
using current API without me having time to give proper support.

>From to other side I would love to have PDKMaster + FlexLib + FlexMem
ported to Sky130. Although I would like to have part of the budget
allocated to me so I can proper support.
I propose to continue this discussion after the tape-out ?
```

Hi Staf, please do not feel the need to respond to this. I am raising this
*deferred* bug report so that you and luke can continue the discussion *after*
the tapeout.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.