[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Fri Jun 12 17:28:15 BST 2020


--- Comment #11 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #10)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #8)
> > > I like bugzilla and think it's fit for purpose,
> > 
> > i like it other than it's centralised (has no option to store its data in a
> > git repository).
> Interesting... What is required for such decentralization? In other words
> why can't bugzilla be backed by a git data store?

probably simply because nobody came up with the idea.  bugseverywhere which
does exactly that is not very commonly used.

> > > but I'd also like to be able to view some of the information on a much more
> > > structured (visually) form,
> > 
> > yes me too.  i installed graphviz on the server (xdot) so that dependency
> > graphs now work.
> > 
> > however a kanban board is much superior.
> Saw that, it's cool, but not quite as useful as the board as it does not
> show that >300 of the <400 total bugs are assigned to you... among other
> things :)
> > alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
> > fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.
> > 
> > rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a
> > deployment where apache2 operates on port 8080 and nginx does a
> > transparent proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org
> Sure, I think apache via nginx is fine. Alain, should the kanban board work
> after this is done?
> > yes.
> > 
> > example: not having a visual tracker stops people from appreciating that of
> > the 370 bugs on here, well over 300 of them are specifically assigned to me.
> Indeed. I think we need a space separate from the "libre-riscv website"

ah ok

> bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters.
> Can you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for
> "Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new
> bugzilla 'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have
> "Product Libre-riscv website"?

yep.  toplevel.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the libre-riscv-dev mailing list