[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 1044] SVP64 implementation of pow(x,y,z)

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1044

--- Comment #39 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #37)
> but just going straight to something inefficient (such as the
> loop-unrolled mul256 algorithm you wrote, although it gets us
> one incremental step ahead), this is *not* satisfying the conditions
> of the grant.

which definition of efficiency are you using?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.