[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 565] Improve formal verification on PartitionedSignal

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565

--- Comment #9 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cesar Strauss from comment #8)
> The story so far:

:)

> This code assumes equally spaced partition points.

i think we can get away with that.  the other permutation set would be
"aligned" ones.  so 16-8-8 but not 8-16-8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.