scheming-pony at protonmail.com
Wed Feb 19 19:15:23 GMT 2020
> as jacob said, we've already made the decision, 18 months ago, to go
> with Vulkan because it's the focal point/
Sunk cost fallacy?
Weatherhead, P.J. (1979). "Do Savannah Sparrows Commit the Concorde Fallacy?". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Springer Berlin. 5 (4): 373–381. doi:10.1007/BF00292525.
> we simply do not have the engineering resources to do dozens of
> different massively-complex software drivers suited and optimised to
> every single corner of the 3D and Parallel Compute industry.
I'm just going to be blunt and say this, Vulkan is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_tarpit in my tiny insignificant opinion.
> later we can consider that, once we have multi-million-dollar backing.
Your flexible architecture could allow us to to OpenGL and Vulkan in parallel, with your current budget. See my off-list email about Taiwan. My laptop battery is at 1% and my brain needs liquid cooling possibly with ethanol at this point.
More information about the libre-riscv-dev