[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 179] openpower eula is out, needs review

[Cole Poirier]

I thought we had decided to go with Libre-SOC over LibreSOC because of the unavailability of libresoc.org.

My one concern with the EULA is with this paragraph: “OpenPOWER ISA Compliance Definition” means the validation procedures associated with architectural compliance developed, delivered, and maintained by OPF as specified in the following link: https://openpowerfoundation.org/?resource_lib=openpower-isa-compliance-definition.

That link points to a compliance definition with IBM Power ISA Version 2.07 B. I was under the impression, perhaps erroneously, that the OpenPOWER ISA and associated compliance would be with Power ISA V3.0B Specification.

Cole

> On Feb 14, 2020, at 8:55 AM, bugzilla-daemon at libre-riscv.org wrote:
> 
> http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
> 
> --- Comment #4 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> ---
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #1)
>> https://git.libre-riscv.org/?p=crowdsupply.git;a=blob;f=updates/
>> 022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn;hb=HEAD
> 
> Before releasing this, we should decide how we're going to spell Libre-SOC, for
> consistency's sake, since we still haven't decided between Libre-SOC, LibreSOC,
> and other alternatives. We should also change the website to consistently use
> whichever variant we decide on.
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> _______________________________________________
> libre-riscv-dev mailing list
> libre-riscv-dev at lists.libre-riscv.org
> http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev