[libre-riscv-dev] partitioned compare and mux

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at lkcl.net
Fri Feb 7 14:26:19 GMT 2020

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Michael Nolan <mtnolan2640 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
> >
> > ...yes agreed it's sub-optimal.  if you can take out the use of
> > RippleLSB (which i just added), that will be a useful module for
> > later, yes, for predicate mask processing.
> >
> > i will move on to create a PartitionMux class now that i have
> > something i know will "work" on it, if you can do something less
> > logic-costly but don't remove RippleLSB itself?
> Sure, I'll modify reorder_results to do that for partitioned_compare.

great.  make sure to git pull grab what i've done, and if you can
double-check that test_partsig.py works before committing then the
PartitionedMux i'll just be adding shortly should work fine.

> >
> > also apologies i didn't update the formal tests but it will basically
> > be, where there are Assert output[2] == 0, that will now be Assert
> > output[2] == output[1] and so on in a chain down to the relevant
> > partitioned-LSB?
> I'll do that too



More information about the libre-riscv-dev mailing list