[libre-riscv-dev] partitioned compare and mux
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Fri Feb 7 14:26:19 GMT 2020
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Michael Nolan <mtnolan2640 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
> > ...yes agreed it's sub-optimal. if you can take out the use of
> > RippleLSB (which i just added), that will be a useful module for
> > later, yes, for predicate mask processing.
> > i will move on to create a PartitionMux class now that i have
> > something i know will "work" on it, if you can do something less
> > logic-costly but don't remove RippleLSB itself?
> Sure, I'll modify reorder_results to do that for partitioned_compare.
great. make sure to git pull grab what i've done, and if you can
double-check that test_partsig.py works before committing then the
PartitionedMux i'll just be adding shortly should work fine.
> > also apologies i didn't update the formal tests but it will basically
> > be, where there are Assert output == 0, that will now be Assert
> > output == output and so on in a chain down to the relevant
> > partitioned-LSB?
> I'll do that too
More information about the libre-riscv-dev