[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Thu Apr 9 21:28:12 BST 2020


https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #14 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #13)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #11)
> > 
> > > I'm guessing the source address will be
> > > git-mirroring at jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk
> > 
> > ah if you install ssmtp and set it up similar to how it is done on the
> > ppc64 server, we can make it look like the messages are coming from
> > libre-soc.org.
> 
> If we use the lettre.at library for sending build emails, we could set it to
> just connect directly to libre-soc.org over the vpn without needing a local
> email server.

ssmtp is not a local email server it's a redirector.

the less that gets done here the better.

can you arrange for the command to call an external command - the faster
this gets done in the least amount of time the better.

(there's no need to use a complicated advanced rust mail library:
get the information out as fast as possible and let *another*
external command do that job, this provides flexibility)


> We could also make the source address be builds at libre-soc.org
> instead of git-mirroring at jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk that way it
> won't change if we move to a different server. 

yes.

> > take a look in the /etc/ssmtp directory on the pp64 server
> >  
> > > If you can, the Reply-To: header for both special-use mailing lists should
> > > be set to libre-soc-dev at libre-soc.org
> > 
> > hmmm a case could be made for teaching people "um no you go to the
> > bugtracker" by rejecting replies.  otherwise they will think that they
> > _should_ reply and we are back to square one.
> 
> We could add a link to the new bug page to the emails sent out to the builds
> mailing list. If we are going to reject replies we should set Reply-To: to
> no-reply at libre-soc.org instead of leaving it as the default.

yep good idea.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the libre-riscv-dev mailing list