[libre-riscv-dev] fp special functions
hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
Mon Aug 5 05:15:24 BST 2019
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:49:13AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> am a fan of just saying "IEEE754" here. exact results. makes testing
> easier, yes. my feeling is: if people *really want* inaccuracy, it
> should be as a sub-extension.
Amdahl's 360 clones did their operations lat-bit accurately. IBM's
original didn't do them all correctly. Amdahl was forced by its
customers to install a switch that would force the machine to produce
the same wrong answer as IBM's.
More information about the libre-riscv-dev